Видео

Cool, so the Feeling is pointed outwards. Great, okay... WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT MEAN??? - A fellow INFJ

Good video. I hear a lot of ideas in this video about the mode of tackling large scale problems that the metamodernist perspective entails, but I hear no epistemic justification for it. It sounds like a completely pragmatic endeavor, that's not really about ascertaining what's true, but rather pretend things like, grand narratives, to be true. But who decides this, and how? Who are the agents acting in the metamodernist mode, and how do they epistemically justify this position? Statisticians, using data? Or philosophers? With the increasingly fracture in epistemic fields together combined with ever growing sets of data, how would a dialogue work out, considering that philosophers cannot possibly be an epistemic agent in a general sense today, but rather must be specialized in certain fields; so to create this metamodernist synthesis (if I understand the mode correctly), there must be a communication between these different epistemic fields. Maybe AI will become a crucial tool for this type of work. Maybe there will be need for a category of synthesizing philosophers (a synthesis of statistician and philosopher!) Here are two other questions. -Does the metamodernist bring back Telos into the world? Not as a metaphysical presupposition but rather a pragmatic. -What about the big religious societies that absolutely not would agree that humanity as a whole is going through a meaning crisis, but would rather point out that sections of it might do?

No superiority to the counterpart live in peace

You know even as a non-christian there's something about Kierkegaard that just sparks my interest.

can Sartre's philosophy be used aganist Sartre? I hate him but his philosophy is generaly beautiful...

Wow you spent 6 minutes looping all around to say in one sentence that Neitzsche challenged your assumptions. I need to reed more philosophy so I too can spin words around in an eloquent way

Can you tell me the theory book for metamodernism to follow for my research

I couldn't stop thinking I was listening to Robert Carlyle. The accent is distracting. 😊

Another fantastic exploration of Nietzsche, thanks !

So we're just going to make fun of people here now?

my take on Nihilism is simply that it was mans mistake to make himself god, he is not god and his consciousness is incomplete without belief in the higher, as he can only decide by fooling himself

Not a single woman in the thumbnail. We men really screw them over didn't we?

very impressive and helpful! thank you!

"ignorance is bliss" is only true for those who are not visibly marginalized in society

tf is this video? lol

Thank you. Very informative.

This relates to weak emergence and strong emergence in 20:39 information theory.

Why people saying it's "anti" spirituality? Anti new age woowoo nonsense maybe, yes. But Jed is absolutely inline with all the classic teachings like advaita and rest of them!

I t would appear that Newton`s 3rd law of motion is an example of Enantiodromia. And I am reminded of Hegelian Dialectic ; Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis (which becomes the new Thesis )

Great job

Deadly Do by the way !

Any chance of doing a video on Marcus Aurelius ?

I was just here for the song, stayed for curiosity

Thank you so much for your insights here. Kierkegaard for me poses a profound question with regard aesthete ethic and faith: when I teach meditation and yoga and wider contemplative practice I encourage them to go beyond the worlds of aesthetic and ethic to find their own faith and process. To let go of certainty is such a challenge for them

You did a really good job on this text. Keep up the good work.

thank you for helping me understand

So "power" is just any interactions between individuals in a society. We can zoom in or zoom out to see the local or the overall picture. I guess at this point, to investigate power, we should consult sociology people.

So damn close to individuation.

10:58 the influence of ideas as restructuring reality.

Both the Bhagavadgita and Oppenheimer must be understood through the pre-historic elites; the bloodlines of Ouroboros. They consist of two factions, the global Feudal Trinity which Hindu scriptures call the Naga Serpent led Alliance who have a main affiliation to Pleiades, and their nemesis the Rakshasa reptilian hybrids that Hindus called the Rakshasa with genealogical root on Aldebaran in Constellation Taurus. The latter are our miners, crafts and tradesmen who later became the Mercantilist/Liberals and who the bankers used as a front. The bankers are the occult Venetian Black Nobility who Jordan Maxwell have shown previously were the Phoenecians, meaning "merchant banker". Greta is Illuminati of the Rakshasa cast and her mother, actress Malena Ernman, exclaimed, "everyone sells their Soul to the Devil at some point." * vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/the-elite-machine-behind-greta-thunberg/ Vigilant Citizen is specialized on semiotics, primarily in pop culture and the high coture fashion scene (a playground of Illuminati) but also within the news. Seriously recommend you read about your favourite films and music vids there. Note that Oppenheimer made a fact statement and that we don't perceive the value judgement, but knowing he was a Talmudist/Kabbalist one understands he actually bragged about being "the destroyer of worlds." Ouroboros' bloodlines are escatological Millenarians and who Fredric Jameson has observed constitute the arts crowd doing "masonic handshakes/signals". We're waking up and by the year constitute an ever bigger threat against Oroboros' bloodlines who's existence demands they send the world into global cataclysm. See only how little empoverished Yemen not only beat the GCC+Egypt+Morocco+USA in the 2015-2023 Yemen War but now has bombed Eilat several times and chased NATO away. The Illuminati knows that 2024 is the last year they'll have a chanse to end Humanity... Werner von Braun leaked the End Times will come in three stages (see p103-129 on the Armaegean): www.academia.edu/92289225/Erdogan_An_Illuminati_stooge_PLAYing_the_Antichrist Archaeologist Michael Tellinger has shown the Neolithic Revolution false, that the Age of Atlantis was ended by Ouroboros: *www.academia.edu/117486886/The_Nazis_and_the_Cabal_Antarctica_UFOs_and_Illuminati_Controlled_Opposition The conspiracy for a post-cataclysmic world with only 2% survivors is open (example): *www.academia.edu/117484589/The_NWO_Corrected_Society_A_Conspiracy_by_the_Bnei_Baruch_Kabbalah_Education_and_Research_Institute

This commentator speaks too slowly, he needs for the good of us all to accelerate his speech.

damn my goat was a socialist 😭 i guess ill separate the art from the artist 😓🙏

Inclusiveness is a big deal.

Justice, one hundred percent, Blessed Be.

what,s more important PRIMARY IMPRINTING OR SECONDARY SOCIALISATION

Not to be a social climate change denier but how do you compare the depression rates between now and medieval times when the numbers you're using for comparison only go back to the 1950s? That seems like a *lot* of extrapolation.

You are saying the professor must have a POV relative to his subject.That is a witless and even ignorant position. The truth itself is multifaceted, ergo no person is perfect. If McKenna won’t adhere to his teaching is not a measure of the teaching. Don’t say that anymore.

Thanks a lot for your nice videos on all the subjects. 😍😍😍

Ouch the recording is horrible

Marx was an exceedingly delusional ultraviolent psychopathic narcissist who, like his hero Mephistopheles, essentially wanted to destroy the world... His favorite line from Goethe's Faust was "Everything that exists deserves to perish". And like every other die hard socialist I have ever known, he was utterly economically illiterate. If you want to study real economics, research Austrian school laissez faire market capitalism, and then you will get some idea about exactly how delusional he truly was.

Thank you for putting into words what I have long been uncomfortable with about JP. I too find his “make your bed” ideas sage advice, but the oversimplification of complex philosophy to promote FUD to be concerning. Brilliant job unpacking this with empathy and depth!

Genuinely the best YY video on the subject. Thank you so much. I will remember you

Buddhism is not religion nor philosophy. It is science.

How is Peterson tyrannical? Except looking at his tweets, have you been following up with his latest content and the new books he has been working on? I agree he is deserving of much criticism, but putting asside the surface assessment of his suits and lucrative endeavors, he still is providing much needed content and insight and I appreciate his deep dive into christianity.

alot of things you left out, Such as by the age of say 50 yrs,, if one has not begun work w his Unconscious,, its doubtful he will make any develeopments in his inner man. By the age of 60 its too late, a man at 60 will become swallowed by the collective spirit and lose his way to the paths in the unconscious, Witness Judas who turned on Yeshau,, He did ZERO inner work in his 28 yrs od life. WE live in very dangerous times, Inner work has to begin at age 25. If not the shadow has grown so big at age 60 ones life has been all shadow. = Just best keep kicking the can down the road.

In the middle of reading some of Erich Neumann’s work. His insight into the Ouroboros archetype and the struggle to burst free from the pleromatic forces of the Great Mother have had me thinking about the great fight of life-the struggle for consciousness. We have to kick back against regressing into a state without pleasure and pain lest we lose ourselves. This is clearly depicted in the Last Man. There’s an interesting storyline in the Scavengers Reign animation on Max right now that really embodies the matter too.

Yes and no. It's true he considered communism to be a definitively post-industrial idea, and therefore something which grew out of and transcended capitalism's material advances, but that's a bit different from him viewing communism as an extension of capitalism, or "loving" capitalism in your terms - for him capitalism was still fundamentally exploitative and therefore a basic threat to human freedom, which was generally his main priority. (We are talking, after all, about the thinker responsible for the best known expression of the labour theory of value and the idea of industrial alienation). Note also that "communism" isn't a Marxist term in origin as implied here - there was already a fully-formed communist movement by the time he became influential. Anyway none of this is to say that this isn't effective rhetoric for getting people interested in him (frankly I don't know whether it is or not, but if it is that's definitely a good thing). Likewise we of course don't need to follow Marx blindly. Bookchin's ideas are, I think, much more relevant and applicable to our contemporary context so for those not already familiar with him, look him up.

How about this. Yes, we are all living in a simulation. A simulation each of us creates in our mind. You could say that the mind is a best guess generator, the result being what we perceive from second to second. Cues from the present are melded together with experience from the past, that is the simulation input. Also what we are looking for in a situation also has its effects. My guess is that there is some slight variance between people in this process.

Postmodernism is the owner of babble